Atomic Backland 109 vs Line Bacon 115
Skis comparison — 2024-2025 season
Compare two models
How they compare
Both skis are designed for freeride and powder riding. They share a twin tip shape — symmetrical tips for skiing switch and park; playful and forgiving. Both feature hybrid (rocker/camber) profiles — mix of camber and rocker zones for all-mountain versatility—grip, float, and play in one profile.
Ratings
Piste
Atomic Backland 109
3
Line Bacon 115
3
Powder
Atomic Backland 109
9
Line Bacon 115
9
Freestyle
Atomic Backland 109
3
Line Bacon 115
3
Freeride
Atomic Backland 109
6
Line Bacon 115
6
Stiffness
Atomic Backland 109N/A
Line Bacon 115N/A
Versatility
Atomic Backland 109
5
Line Bacon 115
5
Atomic Backland 109
Line Bacon 115
Core Specs
TerrainFreeride, Powder
TerrainFreeride, Powder
ShapeTwin Tip
ShapeTwin Tip
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
FlexN/A
FlexN/A
Riding LevelAdvanced
Riding LevelAdvanced
MSRPN/A
MSRP$864.95
Target AudienceAdults
Target AudienceAdults
Shape Profile
184 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
178 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
Camber Profile