Dynastar M-Free 112 F-Team vs Line Vision 96 Camo
Skis comparison — 2024-2025 season
Compare two models
How they compare
Both skis are designed for all mountain and freeride riding. They share a twin tip shape — symmetrical tips for skiing switch and park; playful and forgiving. Both feature hybrid (rocker/camber) profiles — mix of camber and rocker zones for all-mountain versatility—grip, float, and play in one profile.
Ratings
Piste
Dynastar M-Free 112 F-Team
7
Line Vision 96 Camo
7
Powder
Dynastar M-Free 112 F-Team
5
Line Vision 96 Camo
5
Freestyle
Dynastar M-Free 112 F-Team
6
Line Vision 96 Camo
6
Freeride
Dynastar M-Free 112 F-Team
5
Line Vision 96 Camo
5
Stiffness
Dynastar M-Free 112 F-TeamN/A
Line Vision 96 CamoN/A
Versatility
Dynastar M-Free 112 F-Team
8
Line Vision 96 Camo
8
Dynastar M-Free 112 F-Team
Line Vision 96 Camo
Core Specs
TerrainAll Mountain, Freeride
TerrainAll Mountain, Freeride
ShapeTwin Tip
ShapeTwin Tip
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
FlexN/A
FlexN/A
Riding LevelAdvanced
Riding LevelAdvanced
MSRPN/A
MSRPN/A
Target AudienceAdults
Target AudienceAdults
Shape Profile
190 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
178 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
Camber Profile