Line Bacon 115 vs Rmu Butterknife SR126
Skis comparison — 2024-2025 season
Compare two models
How they compare
Both skis are designed for freeride and powder riding. They share a twin tip shape — symmetrical tips for skiing switch and park; playful and forgiving. Both feature hybrid (rocker/camber) profiles — mix of camber and rocker zones for all-mountain versatility—grip, float, and play in one profile.
Ratings
Piste
Line Bacon 115
3
Rmu Butterknife SR126
3
Powder
Line Bacon 115
9
Rmu Butterknife SR126
9
Freestyle
Line Bacon 115
3
Rmu Butterknife SR126
3
Freeride
Line Bacon 115
6
Rmu Butterknife SR126
6
Stiffness
Line Bacon 115N/A
Rmu Butterknife SR126N/A
Versatility
Line Bacon 115
5
Rmu Butterknife SR126
5
Line Bacon 115
Rmu Butterknife SR126
Core Specs
TerrainFreeride, Powder
TerrainFreeride, Powder
ShapeTwin Tip
ShapeTwin Tip
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
FlexN/A
FlexN/A
Riding LevelAdvanced
Riding LevelAdvanced
MSRP$864.95
MSRPN/A
Target AudienceAdults
Target AudienceAdults
Shape Profile
178 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
Not available for this model
Camber Profile