Line Vision 96 Camo vs Scott Pure Mission 98Ti
Skis comparison — 2024-2025 season
Compare two models
How they compare
Both skis are designed for all mountain and freeride riding. They share a twin tip shape — symmetrical tips for skiing switch and park; playful and forgiving. Both feature hybrid (rocker/camber) profiles — mix of camber and rocker zones for all-mountain versatility—grip, float, and play in one profile.
Ratings
Piste
Line Vision 96 Camo
7
Scott Pure Mission 98Ti
7
Powder
Line Vision 96 Camo
5
Scott Pure Mission 98Ti
5
Freestyle
Line Vision 96 Camo
6
Scott Pure Mission 98Ti
6
Freeride
Line Vision 96 Camo
5
Scott Pure Mission 98Ti
5
Stiffness
Line Vision 96 CamoN/A
Scott Pure Mission 98TiN/A
Versatility
Line Vision 96 Camo
8
Scott Pure Mission 98Ti
8
Line Vision 96 Camo
Scott Pure Mission 98Ti
Core Specs
TerrainAll Mountain, Freeride
TerrainAll Mountain, Freeride
ShapeTwin Tip
ShapeTwin Tip
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
FlexN/A
FlexN/A
Riding LevelAdvanced
Riding LevelAdvanced
MSRPN/A
MSRPN/A
Target AudienceAdults
Target AudienceAdults
Shape Profile
178 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
177 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
Camber Profile