Apo Apostle 3.0 106 vs Apo Apostle 96
Skis comparison — 2024-2025 season
Compare two models
How they compare
Both skis are designed for all mountain riding. They share a twin tip shape — symmetrical tips for skiing switch and park; playful and forgiving. Both feature hybrid (rocker/camber) profiles — mix of camber and rocker zones for all-mountain versatility—grip, float, and play in one profile.
Ratings
Piste
Apo Apostle 3.0 106
7
Apo Apostle 96
7
Powder
Apo Apostle 3.0 106
5
Apo Apostle 96
5
Freestyle
Apo Apostle 3.0 106
6
Apo Apostle 96
6
Freeride
Apo Apostle 3.0 106
5
Apo Apostle 96
5
Stiffness
Apo Apostle 3.0 106N/A
Apo Apostle 96N/A
Versatility
Apo Apostle 3.0 106
8
Apo Apostle 96
8
Apo Apostle 3.0 106
Apo Apostle 96
Core Specs
TerrainAll Mountain
TerrainAll Mountain
ShapeTwin Tip
ShapeTwin Tip
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
FlexN/A
FlexN/A
Riding LevelAdvanced
Riding LevelAdvanced
MSRPN/A
MSRPN/A
Target AudienceAdults
Target AudienceAdults
Shape Profile
184 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
184 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
Camber Profile