Atomic Automatic 102 vs Atomic Automatic 109
Skis comparison — 2014-2015 season
Compare two models
How they compare
Both target all mountain and freeride terrain, while the Atomic Automatic 109 leans more powder. They share a twin tip shape — symmetrical tips for skiing switch and park; playful and forgiving. Both feature hybrid (rocker/camber) profiles — mix of camber and rocker zones for all-mountain versatility—grip, float, and play in one profile. The Atomic Automatic 102 targets advanced riders while the Atomic Automatic 109 is aimed at expert riders. At $569.98 vs $640.95 MSRP, the Atomic Automatic 102 is the more budget-friendly option.
Ratings
Piste
Atomic Automatic 102
7
Atomic Automatic 109
7
Powder
Atomic Automatic 102
5
Atomic Automatic 109
5
Freestyle
Atomic Automatic 102
6
Atomic Automatic 109
6
Freeride
Atomic Automatic 102
5
Atomic Automatic 109
5
Stiffness
Atomic Automatic 102N/A
Atomic Automatic 109N/A
Versatility
Atomic Automatic 102
8
Atomic Automatic 109
8
Atomic Automatic 102
Atomic Automatic 109
Core Specs
TerrainAll Mountain, Freeride
TerrainAll Mountain, Freeride, Powder
ShapeTwin Tip
ShapeTwin Tip
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
FlexN/A
FlexN/A
Riding LevelAdvanced
Riding LevelExpert
MSRP$569.98
MSRP$640.95
Target AudienceAdults
Target AudienceAdults
Shape Profile
180 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
182 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
Camber Profile