Dynastar M-Pro 92 Womens vs Dynastar M-Pro 98 Womens
Skis comparison — 2025-2026 season
Compare two models
How they compare
Both skis are designed for all mountain riding. They share a twin tip shape — symmetrical tips for skiing switch and park; playful and forgiving. Both feature hybrid (rocker/camber) profiles — mix of camber and rocker zones for all-mountain versatility—grip, float, and play in one profile.
Ratings
Piste
Dynastar M-Pro 92 Womens
7
Dynastar M-Pro 98 Womens
7
Powder
Dynastar M-Pro 92 Womens
5
Dynastar M-Pro 98 Womens
5
Freestyle
Dynastar M-Pro 92 Womens
6
Dynastar M-Pro 98 Womens
6
Freeride
Dynastar M-Pro 92 Womens
5
Dynastar M-Pro 98 Womens
5
Stiffness
Dynastar M-Pro 92 WomensN/A
Dynastar M-Pro 98 WomensN/A
Versatility
Dynastar M-Pro 92 Womens
8
Dynastar M-Pro 98 Womens
8
Dynastar M-Pro 92 Womens
Dynastar M-Pro 98 Womens
Core Specs
TerrainAll Mountain
TerrainAll Mountain
ShapeTwin Tip
ShapeTwin Tip
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
FlexN/A
FlexN/A
Riding LevelAdvanced
Riding LevelAdvanced
MSRPN/A
MSRPN/A
Target AudienceAdults
Target AudienceAdults
Shape Profile
162 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
170 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
Camber Profile