K2 AMP 72 vs K2 COOMBAck
Skis comparison — 2013-2014 season
Compare two models
How they compare
Both skis are designed for all mountain riding. The K2 AMP 72 uses a flat shape while the K2 COOMBAck is twin tip. Both feature hybrid (rocker/camber) profiles — mix of camber and rocker zones for all-mountain versatility—grip, float, and play in one profile. The K2 AMP 72 targets intermediate riders while the K2 COOMBAck is aimed at expert riders. At $55.9 vs $59 MSRP, the K2 AMP 72 is the more budget-friendly option.
Ratings
Piste
K2 AMP 72
7
K2 COOMBAck
7
Powder
K2 AMP 72
5
K2 COOMBAck
5
Freestyle
K2 AMP 72
5
K2 COOMBAck
6
Freeride
K2 AMP 72
6
K2 COOMBAck
5
Stiffness
K2 AMP 72N/A
K2 COOMBAckN/A
Versatility
K2 AMP 72
7
K2 COOMBAck
8
K2 AMP 72
K2 COOMBAck
Core Specs
TerrainAll Mountain
TerrainAll Mountain
Shapeflat
ShapeTwin Tip
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
FlexN/A
FlexN/A
Riding LevelIntermediate
Riding LevelExpert
MSRP$55.9
MSRP$59
Target AudienceAdults
Target AudienceAdults
Shape Profile
Not available for this model
181 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
Camber Profile