K2 AMP Rictor 90XTi vs K2 COOMBAck
Skis comparison — 2013-2014 season
Compare two models
How they compare
Both skis are designed for all mountain riding. The K2 AMP Rictor 90XTi uses a flat shape while the K2 COOMBAck is twin tip. Both feature hybrid (rocker/camber) profiles — mix of camber and rocker zones for all-mountain versatility—grip, float, and play in one profile. At $59 vs $189 MSRP, the K2 COOMBAck is the more budget-friendly option.
Ratings
Piste
K2 AMP Rictor 90XTi
7
K2 COOMBAck
7
Powder
K2 AMP Rictor 90XTi
5
K2 COOMBAck
5
Freestyle
K2 AMP Rictor 90XTi
5
K2 COOMBAck
6
Freeride
K2 AMP Rictor 90XTi
6
K2 COOMBAck
5
Stiffness
K2 AMP Rictor 90XTiN/A
K2 COOMBAckN/A
Versatility
K2 AMP Rictor 90XTi
7
K2 COOMBAck
8
K2 AMP Rictor 90XTi
K2 COOMBAck
Core Specs
TerrainAll Mountain
TerrainAll Mountain
Shapeflat
ShapeTwin Tip
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
FlexN/A
FlexN/A
Riding LevelExpert
Riding LevelExpert
MSRP$189
MSRP$59
Target AudienceAdults
Target AudienceAdults
Shape Profile
177 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
181 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
Camber Profile