K2 COOMBAck vs K2 Shreditor 120
Skis comparison — 2013-2014 season
Compare two models
How they compare
Both target all mountain terrain, while the K2 Shreditor 120 leans more freeride/powder. They share a twin tip shape — symmetrical tips for skiing switch and park; playful and forgiving. Both feature hybrid (rocker/camber) profiles — mix of camber and rocker zones for all-mountain versatility—grip, float, and play in one profile. At $59 vs $429 MSRP, the K2 COOMBAck is the more budget-friendly option.
Ratings
Piste
K2 COOMBAck
7
K2 Shreditor 120
7
Powder
K2 COOMBAck
5
K2 Shreditor 120
5
Freestyle
K2 COOMBAck
6
K2 Shreditor 120
6
Freeride
K2 COOMBAck
5
K2 Shreditor 120
5
Stiffness
K2 COOMBAckN/A
K2 Shreditor 120N/A
Versatility
K2 COOMBAck
8
K2 Shreditor 120
8
K2 COOMBAck
K2 Shreditor 120
Core Specs
TerrainAll Mountain
TerrainAll Mountain, Freeride, Powder
ShapeTwin Tip
ShapeTwin Tip
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
FlexN/A
FlexN/A
Riding LevelExpert
Riding LevelExpert
MSRP$59
MSRP$429
Target AudienceAdults
Target AudienceAdults
Shape Profile
181 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
179 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
Camber Profile