Line Bacon 122 vs Line Vision 96 Camo
Skis comparison — 2024-2025 season
Compare two models
How they compare
Both target freeride terrain, while the Line Bacon 122 leans more powder, while the Line Vision 96 Camo leans more all mountain. They share a twin tip shape — symmetrical tips for skiing switch and park; playful and forgiving. Both feature hybrid (rocker/camber) profiles — mix of camber and rocker zones for all-mountain versatility—grip, float, and play in one profile.
Ratings
Piste
Line Bacon 122
3
Line Vision 96 Camo
7
Powder
Line Bacon 122
9
Line Vision 96 Camo
5
Freestyle
Line Bacon 122
3
Line Vision 96 Camo
6
Freeride
Line Bacon 122
6
Line Vision 96 Camo
5
Stiffness
Line Bacon 122N/A
Line Vision 96 CamoN/A
Versatility
Line Bacon 122
5
Line Vision 96 Camo
8
Line Bacon 122
Line Vision 96 Camo
Core Specs
TerrainFreeride, Powder
TerrainAll Mountain, Freeride
ShapeTwin Tip
ShapeTwin Tip
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
FlexN/A
FlexN/A
Riding LevelAdvanced
Riding LevelAdvanced
MSRP$919.95
MSRPN/A
Target AudienceAdults
Target AudienceAdults
Shape Profile
178 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
178 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
Camber Profile