Line Blade Optic 114 vs Line Optic 96 Camo
Skis comparison — 2024-2025 season
Compare two models
How they compare
Both target all mountain terrain, while the Line Blade Optic 114 leans more freeride. They share a twin tip shape — symmetrical tips for skiing switch and park; playful and forgiving. Both feature hybrid (rocker/camber) profiles — mix of camber and rocker zones for all-mountain versatility—grip, float, and play in one profile.
Ratings
Piste
Line Blade Optic 114
7
Line Optic 96 Camo
7
Powder
Line Blade Optic 114
5
Line Optic 96 Camo
5
Freestyle
Line Blade Optic 114
6
Line Optic 96 Camo
6
Freeride
Line Blade Optic 114
5
Line Optic 96 Camo
5
Stiffness
Line Blade Optic 114N/A
Line Optic 96 CamoN/A
Versatility
Line Blade Optic 114
8
Line Optic 96 Camo
8
Line Blade Optic 114
Line Optic 96 Camo
Core Specs
TerrainAll Mountain, Freeride
TerrainAll Mountain
ShapeTwin Tip
ShapeTwin Tip
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
CamberHybrid (Rocker/Camber)
FlexN/A
FlexN/A
Riding LevelExpert
Riding LevelExpert
MSRPN/A
MSRPN/A
Target AudienceAdults
Target AudienceAdults
Shape Profile
186 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
170 — dimensions in mm (width exaggerated)
Camber Profile